|
|
 |
2010 Series : June 1, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To see views enlarged, click on the individual pictures...
| This 18-year-old girl was examined by the surgeon prior to LASIK. He noted that the patient might have strabismus and referred the patient to a strabismus surgeon. The girl has 20/30 vision in each eye wearing -6.00 D -3.00 D X 180 in both eyes. She has “fusion” at near but suppresses the right eye at distance. She has a left head tilt which was also seen in childhood pictures. Neither the patient nor her family were aware of or concerned about “squint”. |
| 1. |
Based on the history and study of the pictures, is it likely that this patient has strabismus? |
|
| a. |
yes; based on the head tilt |
| b. |
no |
| c. |
not enough information is provided |
| d. |
yes; it could be a right superior oblique palsy |
| e. |
(a) and (d) |
|
| 2. |
What information about this patient is important when it comes to answering first question above? |
|
| a. |
head tilt |
| b. |
positive Bielschowsky |
| c. |
primary position alignment |
| d. |
fusion status |
| e. |
(a), (b), and (c) |
|
| 3. |
When it comes to making a decision about how to deal with this patient, the strabismus consultant should: |
|
| a. |
send her back for LASIK; no treatment needed |
| b. |
recommend orthoptic exercises |
| c. |
prescribe a base-up prism in the right lens for a two-month trial |
| d. |
advise the family that muscle surgery should be done on both eyes |
| e. |
none of the above |
|
For answers to the above, click here on or after June 8, 2010.
|