|
2008 Series - September 16, 2008
|
Lecture 16 of 53 NEXT»
|
To see views enlarged, click on the individual pictures...
| This 16-year-old girl had surgery for congenital esotropia at age 4 years. Six months ago she had a second surgery for a hypertropia that appeared alternately in the two eyes. This second surgery was a bilateral large superior rectus recession. She now presents with an intermittent right hypertropia and vision corrected to OD 20/30, OS 20/20 wearing OD +1.25 +2.00 x 30, OS +1.00 +1.50 X 100. The versions in the diagnostic positions, the right hypertropia in the primary position, and the alignment with the translucent occluder are as shown in the pictures. |
| 1. |
What is the most likely diagnosis? |
|
| a. |
Heimann-Bielschowsky response |
| b. |
skew deviation |
| c. |
alternating superior oblique overaction |
| d. |
dissociated vertical deviation (DVD) |
| e. |
none of the above |
|
| 2. |
How would you rate the inferior oblique action? |
|
| a. |
overaction |
| b. |
causing abduction in the right eye in elevation because of limited adduction after the previous medial rectus recession |
| c. |
showing significant strabismus sursoadductorius |
| d. |
cannot determine or make any judgment from the pictures |
| e. |
none of the above |
|
| 3. |
In the case shown here, what would be a logical choice for the next surgical procedure? |
|
| a. |
no further surgery should be done |
| b. |
inferior oblique myectomy |
| c. |
anterior transposition of the inferior obliques |
| d. |
resection of both inferior rectus muscles |
| e. |
none of the above |
|
For answers to the above, click here on or after September 23, 2008.
|